Investment Institute

Is the planet ready for 100-year olds?

  • 03 March 2020 (5 min read)

Increased Longevity is putting massive demands on the world. Not only are we living longer, we are doing so in a world in which climate change, pollution and resource scarcity pose an existential threat to our survival and our planet. As we ponder the prospect of a long life, we can no longer think short-term about either investing or our planet.  We have to approach both in a long-term, sustainable way. And, the question that I believe is at the crux of this is: Can incorporating environmental, social and governance considerations into our investment thinking help to address the challenges and opportunities thrown up by an ageing world?

There are three reasons why I think the answer to that question is yes.

Demographic change

The first is that there is a structural shift underway toward a greater focus on environmental, social and governance factors that is likely to continue for some time. Part of the reason for this is demographic change. Living longer is no longer the privilege of a few or the stuff of science fiction. It touches billions around the world in significant ways and there’s a growing recognition that it will shape our future and, thus, how we need to live today. This is visible, for example, in the ways in which consumer preferences are shifting. For instance, people are drinking fewer high-sugar soft drinks these days, in an effort to be healthier.

Likewise, within the investment space, 86% of millennials are interested in responsible and impact investment as they recognize the power they have to help influence company decisions. Many of these trends are not new, I hear you say. What is new, however, is that now they are all happening  simultaneously. And, because you have companies, investors and corporations all going in the same direction, you are likely to see these disparate elements creating a self-reinforcing cycle. That is why I think this is a structural trend that is here to stay.

Future proofing portfolios

The second reason is the growing recognition that ESG considerations can help to future-proof portfolios and investments by creating a virtuous cycle of financial returns and impact returns. At this point it is useful to define the difference between the ESG integration and impact investing. The key difference is the degree to which the investor is looking to affect change. –Within ESG integration the main objective remains financial performance  and using ESG information to improve my ability to address risks and generate returns. Impact investing, on the other hand, is about having a desirable societal effect as well as delivering financial returns. But, these two aims are mutually reinforcing. A good example of how this works in practice can be found in recent work around the impact of gender diversity on company boards of directors. In recent research, AXA IM Rosenberg Equities explored the links between company diversity and profitability. In essence, what we found was that higher diversity provides a profitability moat for the most profitable companies.

In other words, more diverse companies are more resilient in the face of competitive pressures. By integrating this ESG information into our process we should be better able to identify companies with a better-than-average ability to protect their profits. By doing so, we are them able to make better investment decisions, while, at the same time are promoting the cause of diversity. At the same time, from an impact perspective, strategies that seek to improve board diversity should give rise to more diverse firms that are better equipped to protect future profits.

ESG information is economic in nature

The third, reason is closely linked to the second. From my perspective and that of AXA IM Rosenberg Equities, ESG information is economic in nature. For us, the decision to integrate ESG is investment-led. By using it alongside traditional financial information it can provide a more complete view of what a company is worth. Doing this (and getting it right, of course) should lead to a better risk and return outcome – the means to an end, as I returned to earlier.

That said, I want to emphasise that we expect this improvement to be incremental and to take place over the long run, like many other good investment ideas. Predicting the improvements will not be linear and easy to predict, but we are confident that integrating ESG will improve returns and lower risk for investors over time.

As we live longer, the challenge is going to be how to invest for the long-term, how to identify assets which are going to endure, thrive and contribute to the new reality of our world. We firmly believe that integrating ESG considerations into the decision making process will help to do just that.

Related Articles


Why 2030 will be a pivotal moment for the longevity economy

  • by Peter Hughes, Stephen Kelly
  • 12 April 2022 (7 min read)

Ten talismans for a new understanding of cities in post-pandemic times

  • by Prof. Dagmar Haase
  • 20 October 2021 (10 min read)

The expanding middle class: why global affluence is a developing trend

  • by AXA Investment Managers
  • 17 August 2021 (10 min read)


    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date. All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document. Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    This document has been edited by AXA INVESTMENT MANAGERS SA, a company incorporated under the laws of France, having its registered office located at Tour Majunga, 6 place de la Pyramide, 92800 Puteaux, registered with the Nanterre Trade and Companies Register under number 393 051 826. In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    In the UK, this document is intended exclusively for professional investors, as defined in Annex II to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2014/65/EU (“MiFID”). Circulation must be restricted accordingly. 

    Back to top