Investment Institute
Monthly Market Update

May Op-Ed - Peak hawkishness reached? Give it a bit more time

  • 24 May 2022 (7 min read)

Key Points

  • Central banks’ hawkish rhetoric continues to get more intense despite the state of the financial markets.
  • The Federal Reserve no longer tries to talk up a “painless tightening” and acknowledges that pain is in the pipeline for inflation to be brought back under control. Yet, there is a readiness to “look a recession in the eye”.
  • This creates a difficult configuration for markets. We think that in the second half of this year, the deterioration in the dataflow will make it impossible for monetary policy to deliver all the tightening that is currently priced in, but before such a change in mood at central banks is effective, the economy needs to slow down more.

Giving up on “painless tightening”

We wrote last month that the monetary policy hawks found themselves in a “sweet spot”, as inflation continued to move higher – and in the case of the Euro area spread to more sectors – while the data flow on the real side of the economy was still on the whole decent despite the fallout from the Ukraine war. Jay Powell could comfortably argue that there is so much overheating in the US that the economy can take a quick return to the Federal Reserve (Fed)’s neutral rate – the Fed’s central tendency between 2.3% and 2.5% – without triggering a significant slowdown. Meanwhile, signs that the European Central Bank (ECB) is willing to accelerate its own lift-off are accumulating fast, with usually centrist Governing Council members such as Villeroy de Galhau explicitly reconciled with seeing the ECB’s policy rate in positive territory by the end of the year (we now expect the first hike for July). It is a “static” view though. We signalled last month our belief that the second half of 2022 was going to become much harder to navigate, and accordingly since then some of the forward-looking component of business confidence surveys – i.e. hiring intentions in the US – have started to move South, while disappointing GDP prints in Euro area countries in the first quarter (Q1) suggest that economic activity was already sub-par before the brunt of the Ukraine war had hit. Markets are already taking a dim view of the months ahead, pricing in a deterioration in corporate turnover and profits.

This new configuration begs the question of whether “peak hawkishness” has been hit, to the point that central banks would need to reconsider the pace of their normalization trajectory. It’s clear that the Fed’s confidence in its capacity to engineer a “painless tightening” is rapidly eroding. After downgrading the soft landing of the US economy into a “soft-ish” landing in his baseline, Jay Powell has been candid enough to concede that the unemployment rate may have to “move up by a few ticks” but Neel Kashkari was more blunt – and in our view more realistic – when he put forward the key question “if we really have to bring demand down to get inflation in check, is that going to put the economy into recession? And we don’t know”. He is not a voting Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) member this year, but his readiness to utter the “r” word is probably telling of the general attitude at the Fed. Yet, acknowledging that policy normalization will inflict significant pain does not mean that the Fed is ready to give up on delivering said normalization. At this stage, it seems that quite a few members are ready to take the risk of a recession, and the generalization of statements supporting the possibility to bring the policy rate above the neutral rate – endorsed by Powell himself last Tuesday – suggest that the need to re-take control of inflation trumps any other consideration, at least for now.

True, while headline and core inflation for April exceeded market expectations in the US, at least the index decelerated relative to March. Still, there are unfortunately signs that price pressure continues to widen. Used cars – which stand for only 5% of the basket for core – have been the bane of US inflation watchers since the exit from the worst of the pandemic given the wild gyrations in their price (the year-on-year changed peaked at a whopping 45% in June 2021). Excluding this item from the calculation, no deceleration has appeared yet.

For now, Biden’s anti-inflation policies seem to focus on areas where he is unlikely to gain support from Republicans. The US President expressed an openness to reverse trade tariffs slapped on Chinese products by the previous administration. He called on Congress to pass the Clean Energy and vehicle tax credits, as well as fixing what he called “glitches” in the Affordable Care Act and allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, all issues on which Republicans – and some moderate Democrats – are likely to mount a stubborn resistance. In a way, resolving inflation in the US may come less from what the Biden administration will do than from what it won’t. Indeed, at least the “demand-side” component of the current inflation spike can be alleviated by allowing the fiscal stimulus from the last few years to “die down”, which would magnify the impact of the Fed tightening.

In the Euro area however, the quantum of fiscal support is currently rising, rather than falling, as governments are mitigating the impact of higher energy and food prices on real income. Some hawkish members of the ECB board – such as Isabel Schnabel – explicitly criticized this approach as “fuelling the inflation fire”. The more fiscal support there is, the more the ECB will feel comfortable about normalizing monetary policy to fight the risk of seeing inflation expectations de-anchoring. In addition, the Fed’ relentless hawkish rhetoric continues to push the dollar higher, and the euro’s weakness will add to the inflation pressure, pushing the ECB towards tougher rhetoric and action.

It can’t be better before it’s worse first

So, it seems central bankers are ready to “look a recession in the eye” given their concerns over inflation. Still, there is always a difference between entertaining the idea of tolerating a potential recession and dealing with an actual one. Yet, we suspect that it will take more than a deterioration in soft data – such as business surveys – to stay their hand. A decline in hard data, with probably a focus on the labour market given the focus on wage dynamics – to be clear, some significant rise in the unemployment rate – may be needed to trigger a re-consideration of the quantum of tightening needed. This is likely to take some time. In Europe, specifically, one factor which may trigger a change of mood at the ECB would be a return of acute sovereign spread widening, since the development of the “anti-fragmentation weapon” they said they were ready to deploy if need be is fraught with political and technical complications. If fragmentation gets very bad, then it’s the overall ECB stance which will have to change. But there again, it may take time (the proximity of general elections in Italy in 2023 may however make this a burning issue towards the end of 2022).

This does not create a great configuration for markets in the immediate future, in the sense that worse news needs to hit the headlines before a significant downward revision in the quantum of central bank hikes being priced in can start. To get the monetary policy “put” into action, the economy – and profits – need to hurt more.

Discover our May Global Market Update page. 

Full slide deck of our May Global Monthly Strategy
Download the full deck (2.36 MB)

Related Articles

Monthly Market Update

July Op-Ed - Signs of recession accumulating, but is it fully in the price?

  • by Gilles Moëc , Chris Iggo
  • 27 July 2022 (7 min read)
Monthly Market Update

July Global Macro Monthly - Temperature keeps on rising for central banks

  • by AXA IM Investment Institute
  • 27 July 2022 (10 min read)
Monthly Market Update

June Op-Ed - Stories for the summer

  • by Gilles Moëc , Chris Iggo
  • 29 June 2022 (5 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.